The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and Murphy Oil, USA, Inc. (“Murphy”) entered into a July 7th Expedited Settlement Agreement (“ESA”) addressing alleged violations of certain federal regulations implementing Section 112(r)(7) of the Clean Air Act. See Docket No. CAA-04-2022-0202(b).
The ESA addresses a facility in Anniston, Alabama (“Facility”).
EPA is stated to have undertaken a compliance monitoring inspection at the Facility on September 30, 2021. Based on the inspection, the ESA provides that Murphy violated the Clean Air Act Section 112(r)(7), Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions.
The alleged violations are stated to include that Murphy did not provide evidence that:
It documented that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices as required by 40 C.F.R. § 68.65(d)(2), because
- There was inconsistent pipe labeling throughout the plant, which is inconsistent with Section 3.1 of ASME A 13.1-2015, and
- There was no site-specific document specifying the modes of fire protection, and there was no documented proof the facility conducted an evaluation of the total product control system, as required by Section 6.27.3.5 of NFPA 58 (2014);
The pre-startup safety review (PSSR) conducted in advance of initial startup of the butane storage and blending system in September 2017 confirmed that construction and equipment is in accordance with design specifications, prior to the introduction of a regulated substance to the process, as required by 40 C.F.R. § 68.77(b)(1), because many action items from the PSSR were not completed; and
The PSSR conducted in advance of initial startup of the butane storage and blending system in September 2017 confirmed that safety, operating, maintenance, and emergency procedures are in place and are adequate, prior to the introduction of a regulated substance to the process, as required by 40 C.F.R. § 68.77(b)(2), because many action items from the PSSR were not completed.
The ESA assesses a civil penalty of $1,680.
A copy of the ESA can be downloaded here.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.