The 93rd Arkansas General Assembly convened for regular session on January 11th.
House Bill 1751 (HB1751) would provide a definition of “renewable energy equipment” for property tax valuation purposes.
The legislation was introduced by Representative Ennett.
The legislation contains a set of findings and intent (“Findings and Intent”) describing the benefits of electricity generation from renewable sources. It also argues that surrounding states have:
. . . specified methods and procedures similar to those in this act for valuation of renewable energy equipment to ensure fairness in determining valuation for taxation purposes . . .
The legislation advocates for the need to:
. . . ascertain, clarify, and make fair, equal, and uniform throughout the state the methods and procedures for valuation of renewable energy equipment for taxation purposes.
This need is stated to be driven by homeowners’ use of such information to determine the financial impact of utilizing renewable energy to identify all revenue and cost over the lifetime of the project.
HB1751 amends Ark. Code Ann. Title 26, Chapter 26, Subchapter 11 to provide a definition for renewable energy equipment which would include:
. . . equipment that harvests solar, wind, or other forms of renewable energy to produce a maximum peak output of twenty megawatts (20 MW) AC nameplate capacity.
Such equipment would also be defined to include all physical components of the installation including without limitation mounting fixtures and hardware.
The bill spells out how renewable energy equipment would be taxed and depreciated for taxation purposes.
The bill has been referred to the Joint Energy Committee.
A copy of HB1751 can be downloaded here.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.