May 23, 2022
By:
Walter G. Wright
Category:
Arkansas Environmental, Energy, and Water Law
Arkansas Environmental, Energy, and Water Law
Download PDF
Earthjustice on behalf of certain organizations and an individual filed a May 9th Petition before the 201st District Court in Travis County, Texas, challenging the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality’s (“TCEQ”) issuance of an air permit to Max Midstream Texas, LLC (“Midstream”). See D-1-GN-22-002153.
The air permit authorizes an expansion of Midstream’s Seahawk Crude Condensate Terminal in Point Comfort, Texas (“Terminal”).
The organizations and individual for which the Petition is filed include:
- San Antonio Bay Estuarine Waterkeeper
- Texas Campaign for the Environment
- S. Diane Wilson
The Petition states that certain plaintiffs asserted that Midstream underestimated the Terminal’s capacity to emit air pollutants. The Terminal’s referenced air emissions are stated to include:
- Volatile organic compounds
- Nitrogen oxides
- Carbon monoxide
- Sulfur dioxide
- Hydrogen sulfide
- Particulate matter
- Greenhouse gases
Midstream is stated to have sought a minor new source review permit as opposed to a Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration (“PSD”) permit.
The Petition alleges that Midstream should have sought a PSD permit based on comments submitted which asserted arguments such as:
- Inappropriate emission factors
- Insufficient information to demonstrate that emissions from the facilities meet all the criteria established by Texas’s federally approved preconstruction permitting rule
- Failure to demonstrate that monitoring, testing, and recordkeeping requirements are sufficient to measure emissions related to the proposed project and the emission limits are practicably enforceable
- Reliance on vendor specifications/engineering knowledge not included in the public application
- Underrepresented expected emissions from truck and marine loading and overestimated collection efficiencies
- Failure to provide the basis for he crude characteristics used to calculate proposed emission limits
Additional arguments made in the referenced comments and a supplement are detailed in the Petition.
The causes of action asserted in the Petition include:
- TCEQ Erred By Denying Plaintiffs’ Requests for a Contested Case Hearing
- TCEQ Erred by Issuing Permit Number 162941 to Max Midstream Texas, LLC
A copy of the Petition can be downloaded here.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.