May 15, 2019
By:
Walter G. Wright
Category:
Arkansas Environmental, Energy, and Water Law
Arkansas Environmental, Energy, and Water Law
Download PDF
I undertook a presentation at the May 9th SEMO-NEARK annual meeting in Norfork, Arkansas, titled:
Environmental Issues Impacting Arkansas/Missouri Municipal Utilities (“Presentation”)
The Presentation focused on a variety of federal and/or state (Arkansas and Missouri) issues affecting municipal utilities.
The aspects of the municipality operations that were addressed include power, wastewater, and water facilities.
The specific issues addressed included:
- Arkansas Governmental Reorganization noting formation of the Department of Energy and Environment (which includes Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality [“ADEQ”], Public Service Commission, Tank Advisory Committee, State Geologists)
- Solar Energy
- AB 1636 (Arkansas)
- Allow schools to participate in Arkansas Energy Performance Contracting
- Contracts can go to 25 years
- SB 145 (Arkansas)
- Allows third party purchasing so a resident or business can host a solar energy system
- Solar size limit from 300 KW to 1000 KW
- Missouri Legislation
- Grants for Utility Projects (increased to $3,000 per connection)
- Missouri Clean Water Law (exempting agricultural stormwater discharges and return flows from certain clean water permitting requirements in specific situations)
- Clean Water Act
- Addressing jurisdictional elements
- Noting Obama/Trump rule WOTUS interpretational proposed changes
- Does a Discharge to Groundwater Require an NPDES Permit?
- Addressing recent federal Appellate Court decisions including Maui
- Pending United States Court review
- Noting U.S. Environmental Protection guidance issued on the issue
- Reminder about broader Arkansas/Missouri jurisdiction
- Impacts of the groundwater/water U.S. issue
- Note referencing continued environmental organizations suits addressing groundwater until a United States Supreme Court resolution
- Arkansas Water Quality Trading Update
- Arkansas Antidegradation Update
- Arkansas Water Quality Standards/Minerals
- Arkansas Water Quality Standards/Nutrients
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) approval of Missouri Lakes Numeric Nutrient Standards
- Des Moines Waterworks Lawsuit against Three Iowa Drainage Districts Alleging Nitrate Issues
- Discussion of PFAS’s
- Noting pending lawsuits
- Introduced federal legislation
- States with numerical limits
- Finalization of EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Pharmaceutical Rule (impact on water and wastewater utilities)
- Water Quantity/Equitable Apportionment
- Memphis v. Tennessee
- Is groundwater an interstate resource subject to equitable apportionment among the states?
- Mississippi Complaint challenging pumping by Memphis Light, Gas and Water
- U.S. Supreme Court appoints magistrate to determine whether Mississippi has sole authority and control over groundwater stored naturally within its borders
- Arkansas Medical Marijuana Rules
- Issues relevant to the municipal utilities
- Employee issues associated with the legal use of medical marijuana (note nondiscrimination provision and need to create safety sensitive positions as appropriate)
- Medical marijuana cultivation and dispensary use of water and wastewater services
- Significant energy consumption
- Clean Air Act/Arkansas (potential combination of Regulations 18, 19 and 26)
- Missouri/Arkansas Storage Tank Trust Fund (continuing importance)
- Cooperative Federalism
- EPA prioritization of greater control by the states
- Greater state responsibility but no additional federal resources
- Baseline statutes have not changed
- Environmental organizations challenging EPA decisions
- Criminal/Civil Enforcement including examples such as:
- CERCLA Section 103 notification requirements
- OSHA enforcement addressing tank entry and trenching issues
- Continuing prosecution of knowing environment violations
- Environmental Reporting (Employee First Amendment/Public Employer Retaliation Claim)
- Brownfields (continuing importance of state programs)
A copy of the slides can be downloaded here.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.