The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) published a January 30th Federal Register Notice announcing a final rule approving alternative test methods for use in measuring the levels of contaminants in drinking water to determine compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”) National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. See 89 Fed. Reg. 5773.
The final rule approves 93 additional methods for analyzing drinking water samples.
The SDWA applies certain standards to public water systems that provide water for human consumption through pipes, or other constructed conveyances, to at least 15 service connections or that regularly serve an average of at least 25 individuals daily at least 60 days out of the year. It applies to all large community and non-transient non-community water systems serving more than 10,000 people. A community water system is a public water system that has at least 15 service connections used by year-round residents or regularly serves at least 25 year-round residents.
EPA regulates pursuant to the SDWA contaminants in public drinking water systems that may have an adverse effect on human health. A focus of the SDWA is the establishment of national standards for water quality in public drinking water systems. Section 1412(b)(1)(a) of the SDWA addresses EPA’s authority to establish National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for contaminants.
Public water systems are required to undertake certain sampling and monitoring to determine compliance with the previously referenced SDWA standards. They may use either the testing methods already established in existing EPA regulations or the alternative methods being approved in the January 30th final rule.
EPA provides that for each contaminant (or group of contaminants) the 93 test methods are as effective as one or more of the test methods already approved in the SDWA for such contaminants. The agency has previously noted that:
Section 1401(1) of SDWA states that the newly approved methods ‘‘shall be treated as an alternative for public water systems to the quality control and testing procedures listed in the regulation.’’
A copy of the Federal Register Notice which includes the 93 alternative testing methods can be found here.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.