March 11, 2022
By:
Walter G. Wright
Category:
Arkansas Environmental, Energy, and Water Law
Arkansas Environmental, Energy, and Water Law
Download PDF
The Michigan Attorney General (“AG”) filed a civil action in the Circuit Court for the 30th Judicial Circuit (Ingham County) on behalf of the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy and Michigan Department of Natural Resources against STS Hydropower, LLC, and Eagle Creek Renewable Energy, LLC. See No. 22-0150-CE.
The Complaint alleges that the two companies mismanaged the drawdown of the Morrow Lake to complete repairs of their dam on the Kalamazoo River.
The Complaint addresses the operation of a hydroelectric project on the Kalamazoo River. The hydroelectric project is known as the Morrow Dam. The dam created the impoundment known as Morrow Lake.
The Michigan AG’s Complaint alleges that the State of Michigan and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission requested measures to minimize the environmental impact of the drawdown of the lake. It further alleges that the referenced companies drawdown resulted in hundreds of thousands of cubic yards of settlement mobilizing down a stretch of approximately 30 miles of the Kalamazoo River. This is alleged to have created a public safety hazard, choking the river and smothering aquatic life and habitat as well as impeding recreational use.
The Complaint seeks:
- A declaration that Defendants STS Hydropower, LLC, and Eagle Creek Renewable Energy, LLC, violated Parts 17, 31, 301, 303, 401, and 487 of the NREPA, as well as the common law doctrines of conversion, and public nuisance;
- A declaration that Eagle Creek is the alter ego of STS Hydropower;
- Civil fines;
- Recovery of the full value of natural resource damages;
- A declaration that Defendants' violations of the common law and NREPA have created an ongoing public nuisance and an order requiring the abatement of the public nuisance;
- An order requiring Defendants to restore and repair the damage they caused;
- The relief authorized by MCL 324.1704, MCL 324.3115, MCL 324.30112, and MCL 324.30316; and
- An order reimbursing the State's enforcement expenses, including oversight costs, litigation expenses, and attorney fees.
A copy of the Complaint can be downloaded here.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.