July 13, 2017
By:
Walter G. Wright
Category:
Arkansas Environmental, Energy, and Water Law
Arkansas Environmental, Energy, and Water Law
Download PDF
A vetoed house bill passed by the North Carolina General Assembly would have:
-
Required the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (“DEQ”) to approve aerosolization as an acceptable method of disposal for leachate wastewater collected from a lined sanitary landfill within the lined area of the landfill;
-
Allowed DEQ to approve aerosolization as an acceptable method of disposal for leachate wastewater collected from an unlined sanitary landfill; and
-
Provided that aerosolization of leachate or wastewater that results in a zero liquid discharge and is not a significant air contaminant source does not constitute a discharge that requires a permit under the air or water permitting statutes.
The North Carolina Governor (Cooper) vetoed the bill stating:
. . . the legislature exempts particular technologies that could potentially better ensure the health and safety of people and the environment. Scientists, not the legislature, should decide whether a patented technology can safely dispose of contaminated liquids from landfills. With the use of the word “shall,” the legislature mandates a technology winner, limiting future advancements that may provide better protection.
A North Carolina General Assembly document states that in February 2016 a working group of the Environmental Review Commission met to discuss a variety of issues related to waste management. The working group apparently received information on aerosolization as a process for disposal of leachate at landfills. The briefing included a discussion of aerosolization projects operating within the state of North Carolina. The working group was stated to have received information that:
. . . aerosolization of wastewater is a process by which larger particles (50-2000 microns) are formed in droplets and dispersed over a relatively small area (100’ x 300’).
A copy of House Bill 576 and the General Assembly analysis can be downloaded here.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.