The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the Trenton Light and Water Department (“TLW”) entered into a June 19th Consent Agreement and Final Order (“CAFO”) addressing alleged violations of certain federal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (“PCBs”) regulations. See Docket No. TSCA-04-2018-2902(b).
The PCB regulations were promulgated pursuant to Section 6(e) of the Toxic Substances Control Act and are found in 40 C.F.R. Part 761.
The CAFO provides that TLW is a user of PCB Items operating in the State of Tennessee and is a “person” as defined in 40 C.F.R. § 761.3.
An EPA-authorized Toxic Substances Control Act inspector from the State of Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation is stated to have conducted a PCB Compliance Inspection at a TLW facility on or about February 28, 2017. The inspection is stated to have determined that the PCB Storage Building had a concrete floor and walls not continuous and without curbing. Further, the CAFO states that:
. . . In lieu of curbing, TLW utilizes a universal brand stock water tank for secondary containment of leaking PCB transformers. The tank is a “PCB Container” and/or a “PCB Article Container” as those terms are defined in 40 C.F.R. § 761.3. PCB Containers and PCB Article Containers are “PCB Items” as defined 3 by 40 C.F.R. § 761..
Certain provisions of the PCB regulations are stated to require that PCB Containers and PCB Article Containers be marked with the ML PCB mark as illustrated in 40 C.F.R. § 761.45(a). The position that the mark must be placed is specified by the regulations.
The CAFO provides that the PCB Container/PCB Article Container previously described “was not marked, nor was the wall above the tank, with a ML PCB mark.” As a result, the CAFO alleges that TLW violated 40 C.F.R. §§ 761.40(a)(1) and (9) and (h).
The CAFO states that TLW neither admits nor denies the factual allegations.
A civil penalty of $661 is assessed.
A copy of the CAFO can be downloaded here.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.