The City of Portsmouth, New Hampshire, (“Portsmouth”) filed a September 7th Petition for Review (“Petition”) before the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) Environmental Appeals Board.
The Petition challenges certain conditions in a Clean Water Act National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit issued to Portsmouth by EPA Region 1.
Portsmouth’s Petition states that EPA Region 1 issued an NPDES permit renewal to a Portsmouth Public Owned Treat Works (“POTW”) on August 8th. It describes the permit as allowing its POTW to continue to discharge treated wastewaters to surface waters of the United States.
The NPDES permit is also stated to allow what Portsmouth describes as a:
. . . necessary upgrade and expansion to meet the growing commercial and industrial needs of the Pease International Tradeport, one of the economic engines of the State of New Hampshire.
The expansion is described as an increase in wastewater treatment capacity from the current 1.2 million gallons per day to 1.77 million gallons per day.
The Petition argues that certain conditions in the NPDES permit are “based on clearly erroneous findings of fact and conclusions of law.” It also argues that certain requirements and provisions are in part arbitrary and capricious, not in compliance with law, and exceed EPA’s legal authority.
Certain of the issues are characterized by Portsmouth as being of “national significance.”
Portsmouth challenges the following NPDES permit conditions:
- Rolling Annual Average Effluent Flow, Permit Part I.A.1
- Daily Maximum BOD & TSS Limits, Permit Part I.A.1
- BOD & TSS Loading Limits at 1.77 mgd, Permit Part I.A.1
- Instream Mixing/Dilution Analysis, Permit generally
- General Water Quality Standards Compliance Language, Permit Part I.A.2
- Total Residual Chlorine Limits, Permit Part I.A.1
A copy of the Petition can be downloaded here.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.