January 24, 2023
By:
Devin R. Bates, Benjamin D. Jackson
Category:
Litigation
Litigation
Download PDF
Is there a defense where a plaintiff misused a product? Yes. Under Arkansas law, a defendant may assert that the plaintiff misused the product as part of its affirmative defense of comparative fault. AMI 1014. When invoking this defense, the defendant has the burden of proof to show that the misuse was unforeseeable and that such misuse was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries. This must be done independent of any conduct on the part of the defendant. AMI 1014; see Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-116-105.
For example, in one Arkansas case, the possibility of misuse by the consumer was cited as a reason for affirming grant of directed verdict in favor of the product manufacturer. Lakeview Country Club, Inc. v. Superior Prod., 325 Ark. 218, 224, 926 S.W.2d 428, 431 (1996) (evidence suggested that paint may have been misapplied, suggesting consumer misuse, thus defeating liability against manufacturer).
View more of our Between the Lines products liability blog posts.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.