January 17, 2023
By:
Devin R. Bates, Benjamin D. Jackson
Category:
Litigation
Litigation
Download PDF
What is Arkansas’ law on Comment K to Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts? Arkansas follows comment k to Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts with regard to unavoidably unsafe products. This is an affirmative defense, requiring proof that the product is unavoidably dangerous. West v. Searle & Co., 305 Ark. 33, 38–40, 806 S.W.2d 608, 611–12 (1991). To establish a showing of “unavoidably unsafe”, there must be no feasible alternative design accomplishing the product’s purpose at a lesser risk. The evaluation of a purported alternative design and the product’s actual design should focus on: (1) the magnitude of the product’s risk that the alternative avoids; (2) the costs of the two designs; (3) the benefits of the two designs; and (4) the relative safety of the two designs. Id. at 41.
View more of our Between the Lines products liability blog posts.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.