October 05, 2020
By:
Walter G. Wright
Category:
Arkansas Environmental, Energy, and Water Law
Arkansas Environmental, Energy, and Water Law
Download PDF
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) finalized revisions to the General Provisions of the Clean Air Act National Emission Standards for Hazardous Pollutants (“NESHAP”).
The final rule allows a “major source” of hazardous air pollutants (“HAP”) to reclassify as an “area source” at any time after acting to limit emissions.
EPA argues that the rule will encourage facilities to pursue innovations in pollution-reduction technologies and relieve regulatory requirements intended for larger emission sources. Environmental organizations argued in opposition to the proposed rule that it creates a loophole allowing facilities to opt out of the NESHAP requirements and monitoring by reclassifying themselves as areas sources exempt from Maximum Available Control Technology standards.
The EPA “once-in-always-in” policy was established in 1995. It provided that a facility subject to major source NESHAP standards would always remain subject to such standards. This would be the case even where production processes were changed or controls implemented that permanently reduce the facility’s potential to emit HAPs.
The final rule provides a new EPA interpretation of the relevant Clean Air Act language. The agency states it has no authority to limit when a facility may be determined to be an area source. The rule concludes that facilities may be reclassified as area sources if they take an enforceable limit on their potential to emit HAPs that bring their level of emissions below the major source threshold.
The rule also finalizes amendments to:
- Clarify compliance dates
- Clarify notification and record requirements
Such clarifications apply to sources choosing to reclassify to area source status along with sources that revert back to major source status.
Environmental organizations such as the Sierra Club and Natural Resources Defense Council have indicated a judicial challenge will be filed.
A link to the final rule can be found here.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.