The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) is proposing provisions to the General Provisions of the Clean Air Act National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (“NESHAP”).
David Carstens of Harbor Environmental forwarded a pre-publication copy of the rule and an associated EPA fact sheet.
EPA describes the proposal as implementing:
. . . the plain language reading of the “major source” and “area source” definitions of section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and provide that a major source can reclassify to area source status at any time by limiting its potential to emit (PTE) hazardous air pollutants (HAP) to below the major source thresholds of 10 tons per year (tpy) of any single HAP or 25 tpy of any combination of HAP.
However, potential to emit hazardous air pollutant limits must meet the effectiveness criteria of being legally and practically enforceable.
EPA also characterizes the proposal as clarifying the requirements that apply to sources that reclassify to area source status after the first substantive compliance date of an applicable NESHAP standard. Electronic notification is required when a source reclassifies.
The federal agency had previously issued on January 25, 2018, a guidance memorandum titled:
Reclassification of Major Sources as Area Sources Under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act
The memorandum discussed the statutory provisions that governed when a major source subject to a major source section under Section 112 could be reclassified as an area source – thereby avoiding being subject to major source requirements.
A link to the pre-publication rule can be found here and EPA fact sheet here.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.