The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) issued a November 17th report titled:
Total National Reported Clean Air Act Compliance-Monitoring Activities Decreased Slightly During Coronavirus Pandemic, but State Activities Varied Widely (“Report”)
See Report No. 22-E-0008.
OIG stated it conducted an evaluation to:
- Assess the impacts of the COVID pandemic on the number/type of compliance-monitoring activities by state and local agencies at facilities emitting air pollution
- Determine what guidance EPA provided to state and local agencies to target or prioritize compliance-monitoring activities at facilities
- Determine how state/local agencies conducted compliance-monitoring activities at facilities during the pandemic
In undertaking the evaluation OIG states it distinguished among three types of stationary sources for purposes of compliance-monitoring activities:
- Title V Major Sources
- Synthetic-Minor Sources
- True Minor Sources
State and local agencies with delegated authority are noted to conduct the following air-related compliance-monitoring activities:
- Full-compliance evaluations
- Partial-compliance evaluations
- Stack test reviews
- Title V compliance certification reviews
OIG states that for fiscal years 2016-2020, state and local agencies conducted about 98.5 percent of all air-related compliance-monitoring activities. EPA conducted the remaining 1.5 percent.
The OIG Report concludes that the COVID pandemic:
. . . marginally impacted the total number of nationwide compliance-monitoring activities at facilities that emit air pollution.
Nevertheless, OIG also concluded that activities varied widely among states and territories. Reported changes in activities at high-emitting sources in fiscal year 2020 ranged from an 88 percent decline to a 234 percent increase.
OIG also concludes that state and local agencies shifted some types of compliance-monitoring activities from on-site to off-site. However, this shift is noted to be in accordance with guidance EPA issued in July 2020. This guidance provided some flexibility to state and local agencies to count off-site compliance-monitoring activities toward the Clean Air Act Stationary Source Compliance Monitoring Strategy.
Specific OIG conclusions/observations noted in the Report included:
- Pandemic Had Small Impact on Total Number of Reported Compliance-Monitoring Activities, but State and Territory Activities Varied Widely, and Off-Site Activities Have Not Been Assessed
- Total Air Compliance-Monitoring Activities in FY 2020 Were Slightly Below Historical Average
- Number of Compliance-Monitoring Activities in FY 2020 Varied Across States and Territories
- Total Compliance-Monitoring Activities Started Increasing in July 2020
- State and Local Agencies Reduced On-Site Activities and Increased Off-Site Activities During the Pandemic
- EPA Convened Workgroup to Test Using Remote Video to Conduct Off-Site PCEs but Has Not Yet Finalized Procedures
- State and Local Agencies Relied on CAA CMS Guidance to Prioritize Facilities for Compliance Monitoring During the Pandemic
- EPA Did Not Provide Pandemic-Specific Guidance on How State and Local Agencies Should Prioritize Facilities for Compliance Monitoring
- State and Local Agencies We Reviewed Prioritized Conducting FCEs at Facilities Covered by CAA CMS
A copy of the Report can be downloaded here.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.