The Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials (“ASTSWMO”) issued a document titled:
State Funds Survey Results 2018 (“Survey”)
The Survey was undertaken by the organization’s State Fund – Financial Responsibility Task Force and provides data regarding the various state trust funds that are in place for purposes of addressing storage tank petroleum releases.
Hundreds of thousands of underground storage tanks (“USTs”) are utilized at facilities nationwide to store petroleum and chemical products. These businesses and governmental agencies include convenience stores, bus terminals, fire and police stations, airports, utilities, construction companies and car dealerships. In the 1980s concerns about leaks and other releases from USTs prompted the establishment of a regulatory program for such equipment.
Subtitle I was added to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act in 1984 to require that the United States Environmental Protection Agency develop UST design and installation, leak prevention, detection, and corrective action provisions. 1986 amendments added a requirement for UST owners and operators to meet minimum financial responsibility requirements to address potential third party claims and ensure funds were available to remediate releases.
Concerns regarding the ability of some UST owners and operators to comply with the federal financial responsibility requirements prompted many states (including Arkansas) to create petroleum UST trust funds. The principal purpose of the state trust funds has been to enable UST owners and operators to partially or completely comply with the RCRA financial responsibility requirements. An arguably related benefit has been to alleviate financial institutions or other transactional parties’ concerns about properties that utilize USTs. The trust funds can in some cases be considered liability limiting mechanisms.
The ASTSWMO Survey provides both national aggregate information/data and state by state information/data.
Information discussed in the aggregate portion of the Survey includes:
- Approximate Annual Revenue (billions)
- Approximate Current Balance (billions)
- Outstanding Claims (millions)
- No. of releases with claims
- No. of sites with 3rd party claims
- No. of claims received
- Total No. of sites
- Approximate Total amount Paid (billions)
- Average amount paid/release
- States in which outstanding claims exceed balance
- No. of states which are serving as FR mechanisms
- No. of sites >$1 million
State by state data includes:
- Agency/Department with Primary Responsibility
- State uses outside contracts to administer Fund
- Types of Tanks Covered
- No. of Active Facilities Covered
- Fund Coverage
- Fund Deductible
- Factors affecting limits of coverage
- Time limit for submitting costs to receive payment
- Fund serving as FR mechanism for active tanks
- Use of state fund as FR voluntary
- Fund Sunset Date
Note that most state trust funds only cover USTs. Arkansas is one of the few states whose trust fund potentially covers aboveground storage tanks (if tanks are registered and fees paid).
A link to the Survey can be found here.
The Between the Lines blog is made available by Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. and the law firm publisher. The blog site is for educational purposes only, as well as to give general information and a general understanding of the law. This blog is not intended to provide specific legal advice. Use of this blog site does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Mitchell Williams or the blog site publisher. The Between the Lines blog site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.